How many New Testament manuscripts do we really have?

How does the Bible size up with other books from the ancient world? Is it really true that the New and Old Testament is the book from the ancient world that has the largest amounmt of extant manuscripts? Into how many ancient languages has the Bible been translated? And finally, if we did not have all the manuscript evidence some believe we could still get the gist of the New Testament from early church correspondence. If this is true how does this improve or maintain the general case for an historically accurate New Testament?

asked Jun 3, 2013 at 19:21 Neil Meyer Neil Meyer 3,927 1 1 gold badge 22 22 silver badges 33 33 bronze badges

Let me see. I have at least 15. Full Bibles: 1 KJV-1611, 1 Amplified, 1 NASB, 1 NIV, 2 ESV, 1 Russian Synodal, 1 New Russian. New Testament Only: 1 NIV, 6 Greek Texts.

Commented Jun 3, 2013 at 20:36 @Narnian: I'm willing to bet that none of those are true manuscripts. Commented Jun 3, 2013 at 20:45 @JonEricson But if I copied them by hand in Greek, would they count? Commented Jun 3, 2013 at 20:52 @Narnian: A manuscript is something that was originally written by hand. Commented Jun 4, 2013 at 1:45 covered at christianity.stackexchange.com/questions/9934/… Commented Jun 4, 2013 at 4:42

3 Answers 3

Old Testament

The Dead Sea Scrolls currently housed in the Israeli Dead Sea Scroll museum and available online, is a collection of 972 manuscripts from the period 408 - 308 BC. Seeing as the Old Testament itself consists of books written between 1000 - 600 BC and the late 450s, this is a pretty good collection. There are others, but this is the most well-known and complete collection.

New Testament

According to the site Christian Apologetics Research Ministry, there are currently 5,686 known fragments of New Testament manuscripts. That site also shows how much closer to the date of composition these manuscripts are than many other contemporary texts. The earliest of these (p52) dates to sometime between 96 and 125 AD. Seeing that some people date John to the 90s (others to the 60s), the gap is extremely small indeed.

More interestingly, a good apparatus (like this) can actually show you every variation on the texts, and you will see they are few and far in between. This question shows how an apparatus works.

Other Questions

Finally, you said that we could probably piece together the gist of the bible from early church correspondance. This is completely accurate - as many of the early church fathers were already quoting New Testament Scripture by 100 AD (Martyrdom of Polycarp? 1 Clement? the Didache!) Indeed, Contra Celsius, in 150 is sometimes used to verify reconstructions.
Even the existence of extra-biblical works, both pro and con lend credence to the theory that at least "something" was already going on about Jesus pretty shortly after the events of the New Testament.

More importantly, however, is the fact that much of the New Testament actually is correspondance between churches. Epistles are just that - letters (often from Paul) to churches that predate the Gospels and give a "second witness" to the Good News.

answered Jun 3, 2013 at 20:29 Affable Geek Affable Geek 64.1k 30 30 gold badges 192 192 silver badges 354 354 bronze badges Why not, here's a badge. Merry Christmas. Commented Dec 24, 2014 at 21:14

No ancient literature has survived in its original form and all are derived from copies of the originals. The NT is no exception. However, in comparison with any other ancient literature, the NT is without a peer—both in terms of the chronological proximity and the surviving number. For clarity here is table from an answer from David Startton here:

enter image description here

The earliest copies of Quran are dating back to 688 A.D., a time span of 56 years after the death of Mohammad or a time span of more than 56 years after it was written on fragmented parchments, scapula, leafstalks of date palms etc.

As can be seen from above table all the ancient authorities are preserved in only a handful of manuscripts whereas for NT there are approximately 24,000. About 5,500 Greek manuscripts, ranging in date from the second century AD into the middle ages. Besides the Greek manuscripts, there are nearly 30,000 versional copies (e.g., Latin, Coptic, and Syriac), and over 1,000,000 quotations from the NT in the church Fathers.

The Greek manuscripts are by far the most important as they are earliest manuscripts and since they involve direct reproduction from Greek to Greek. There are four kinds of Greek manuscripts: papyri, uncials (or majuscules), minuscules (or cursives), and lectionaries.

Papyri: Literally thousands of papyrus fragments have been found of which approximately 100 contain portions of the New Testament. Actually, taken together, these 100 fragments constitute over half of the New Testament and all but four are in the form of codices. Though many of them are somewhat fragmentary, and at times the copying was looser than one would like (i.e., they were done before the canon was officially recognized), they are nevertheless extremely important for establishing the text of the New Testament—if for no other reason than the fact that they represent some of the most ancient manuscripts we possess. Five important papyri are illustrated in the chart below.

enter image description here

Uncials: Here are approximately 300 uncials known to exist today that contain portions of the New Testament and one uncial that contains the entire NT. Unlike the papyri they were written on animal skins or vellum. The most important uncials are Aleph or Sinaiticus and Vaticanus of 4 th century.

Minuscule: There are approximately 2,813 NT Greek minuscule manuscripts known to us today. These copies range in date from the ninth to sixteenth centuries, were produced on vellum or paper, and were written in cursive or a lower-case, flowing hand. Among the more important manuscripts cited are Minuscule no: 33 of 9 th century.

Versional Evidence: Versions were initially prepared for missionary purposes. The history and transmission of versions are often quite complex, and scholars often do not agree on or do not know the particular dates or characteristics of the version. There are nearly 30,000 versional copies (e.g., Latin, Coptic, and Syriac),